ctime 表态网论坛--感触

回复楼主
MrC
2014-04-17 11:24

感触

191回复

在breitlingsource看见一个帖。其实我们渴望的是在“传承”上的“进化”而不是推倒过去的“新颖”

well, no surprise at all what I think Breitling should do instead of launching boring JAWs and behemoths - these, and not the surviving nice classics shape the image of the company today.

some of you "don't care about vintage" and heritage, but that seems to be a minority here and among the wider WIS crowd. Just posted my Unitime I wore to a wedding yesterday on a WIS fb group and got asked again where all that elegance went (and some rather unflattering comments about the current lineup) .....

Breitling was an industry leader for much of the 20th century; the first wrist chronograph, the first 2-button, the first "smart watch" chronograph (yes, that's what the 1942 Chronomat was), one of the first waterproof 12h bezel aviator chronographs, one of the most elegant world time watches ever manufactured, (one of) the first automatic chronographs, the first 20atm automatic chrono divers.

now ?

Breitling World Time watches, Basel 1952 vs Basel 2014. enough said.

分享到：

回复 2楼
MrC
2014-04-17 11:26

可能有人会说，应该用Transocean来比较才公平。或许可以看看他们的讨论

http://breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=53290

回复 3楼
MrC
2014-04-17 11:31

"Instruments for Professionals" ，RM的表能往地下丢，百年灵能吗。不砸场子，但真心别老搞不切实际的东西。

回复 4楼
MrC
2014-04-17 11:35

The other area they could make huge improvements is in the area of case materials. Now I'm not saying Breitling should necessarily have a bronze model in their line-up, but even the likes of small boutique brands like Steinhart are now producing bronze cases. Tiny boutique brands like H20 are using Grade 5 titanium ; other brands like Ocean 7 are making ceramic cases.... the list goes on. Why aren't Breitling looking at these options? Instead of that we get the same tired DLC options again and again and again.....Driver8

虽然希望百有新的金属外壳。但千万别搞青铜，拜托